Indirect Detection of Deception: Looking for Change

نویسندگان

  • Christian L. Hart
  • James D. Griffith
چکیده

In this study, we examined the effectiveness of using indirect methods to detect liars. College students viewed a video in which half of the people told some lies and half of the people were entirely truthful. Participants were either asked to detect the liars in the video or they were asked to identify people in the video whose behavior, mannerisms, or speech changed. Participants using the indirect lie detection method of looking for behavioral change were more accurate in their categorizations of liars and nonliars than were participants who were directly and explicitly looking for liars. Current Research in Social Psychology (Vol. 14, No. 9) Hart, Fillmore, & Griffith

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments—results of a registered report

A pre-registered experiment was conducted to examine psychophysiological responses to being lied to. Bridging research on social cognition and deception detection, we hypothesized that observing a liar compared to a truth-teller would decrease finger skin temperature of observers. Participants first watched two targets while not forewarned that they would later be asked to judge (direct and ind...

متن کامل

Literature review for Deception detection

Deception is a very common phenomenon, especially human communication, and people have been interested in how to accurately detect deception for much of human history. In recent years, detecting deception has became a huge point of interest for many different fields of research, such as business, jurisprudence, law enforcement, and national security. Deception and its detection is a complicated...

متن کامل

Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?

The tipping point framework of lie detection posits that people can, and do, accurately detect deception. This framework pinpoints three circumstances that aid accuracy: (i) using methods of measurement that circumvent controlled, conscious cognition; (ii) when individual differences or situational factors portend potent risks to lie detection failure, such as in high-stakes or threatening sett...

متن کامل

The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.

People are poor lie detectors, but accuracy can be improved by making the judgment indirectly. In a typical demonstration, participants are not told that the experiment is about deception at all. Instead, they judge whether the speaker appears, say, tense or not. Surprisingly, these indirect judgments better reflect the speaker's veracity. A common explanation is that participants have an impli...

متن کامل

An Analysis Towards Dialogue-Based Deception Detection

When humans attempt to detect deception, they perform two actions: looking for telltale signs of deception, and asking questions to attempt to unveil a deceptive conversational partner. There has been significant prior work on automatic deception detection that attempts to learn signs of deception. On the other hand, we focus on the second action, envisioning a dialogue system that asks questio...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009